Publications

While science is often portrayed as producing reliable knowledge, scientists tend to express caution about their claims, acknowledging nuances and doubt, all the more so in novel domains of research paved with unknowns. Uncertainty is an intrinsic aspect of scientific inquiry, particularly in recent 

fields such as astrobiology, which tackles numerous hard questions about the origin, evolution, and distribution of life on Earth and elsewhere. Mapping uncertainty in science matters for achieving a more accurate understanding of scientific knowledge. It also helps identify research domains at the frontiers of knowledge where unknowns are the most salient. In this article, we investigate the presence, distribution and context of uncertainty in the field of astrobiology. We analyze a comprehensive corpus of 3,698 research articles published in three major journals in the domain from 1968 to 2020. We use a linguistically motivated approach to identify expression of uncertainty in article full text. The corpus was further segmented into research topics using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to investigate variations in uncertainty across subfields and over time. Our findings show that, while uncertainty has remained relatively stable over the 50 years covered by the corpus, constituting 20–25% of sentences on average, it varies significantly across research fields, highlighting areas where unknowns, doubts and speculations are more prevalent. The analysis also highlights relationships between expression of uncertainty and rhetorical structure. Indeed, higher uncertainty levels were observed in the beginning (introductions) and towards the end (conclusions) of research articles, while middle sections contained less uncertainty. Abstracts also tended to express a slightly higher level of uncertainty compared to main texts, especially with greater variability, suggesting their role in summarizing research and highlighting unknowns. To investigate the context of uncertainty, a lexical analysis was conducted to identify nouns most frequently associated with uncertainty within each topic. Terms such as “life,” “planet,” and “Mars” were found to be strongly associated with uncertainty. Conversely, terms related to experimentation and measurement, such as “sample” and “spectrum,” were linked to an absence of uncertainty, pointing at a dichotomy between speculative and evidence-based lines of inquiry. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the field of astrobiology and exemplify the relevance of the proposed method to identify uncertainty-related concepts in corpora of full text publications. They also offer a foundation for future comparative studies across disciplines.

Atanassova, I., Ningrum, P. K., Gutehrlé, N., Lareau, F., et Malaterre, C. (2025). Is There Life on Mars? Studying the Context of Uncertainty in Astrobiology. Dans S. Sargsyn, W. Glänzel, et G. Abramo (dir.), Proceedings. 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Infometrics (vol. 1) (p. 1124-1138). Yerevan: ISSI.